• Sachiyuki Tsukada, Motohiro Wakui, and Munenori Matsueda.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nekoyama Miyao Hospital, 14-7 Konan, Chuo-ku, Niigata, Niigata, 950-1151, Japan. s8058@nms.ac.jp
• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Jun 1;133(6):861-8.

BackgroundThe ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC)-bearing couple in total hip arthroplasty (THA) was developed to reduce the wear debris and osteolysis. Although the mechanical strength of third-generation ceramic has improved over previous generations, the risk of osteolysis and ceramic fracture is still an important concern.MethodsWe studied 124 uncemented THAs with third-generation CoC-bearing couple implanted between 2000 and 2004. The ceramic liner and head were secured with the direct taper locking mechanism. One hundred and eleven hips were followed-up for minimum of 8 years, with an average follow-up period of 10.1 years (range 8.0-12.8 years). Patients were evaluated with a particular emphasis on the prevalence of the osteolysis and the ceramic fracture.ResultsThe survivorship with the end point as implant revision for any reason was 94.9 % (95 % confidence intervals 90.0-99.3 %) at 12.8 years. Revisions were performed because of one ceramic liner fracture, three dislocations, and two deep infections. No radiographic evidence of wear or osteolysis was observed. The preoperative Merle d'Aubigne and Postel hip score increased from 11.6 to 17.1.ConclusionsPatients, who received third-generation CoC THA had no detectable wear and osteolysis. One ceramic fracture occurred, and the main reason for revision was dislocation.

17 keywords...

hide…