• Acta radiologica · Aug 2015

    Comparative Study

    Assessment of multifocality and axillary nodal involvement in early-stage breast cancer patients using 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and sentinel node biopsy.

    • Nurhan Ergul, Huseyin Kadioglu, Seyma Yildiz, Serap Baskaya Yucel, Zuhal Gucin, Ezgi Basak Erdogan, Mehmet Aydin, and Mahmut Muslumanoglu.
    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey nurhanergul@yahoo.com.
    • Acta Radiol. 2015 Aug 1; 56 (8): 917-23.

    BackgroundNon-invasive evaluation of the extent of axillary nodal involvement in early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients and accurate assessment of multifocality are both challenging. Few reports have explored whether 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) might be more useful than other diagnostic methods in these contexts.PurposeTo prospectively evaluate the diagnostic utility of FDG PET/CT, contrast-enhanced, and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI and DWI), and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB), in detection of axillary metastatic lymph nodes in ESBC patients; and to explore the utilities of FDG PET/CT and DCE-MRI for identification of multifocality.Material And MethodsTwenty-four female patients (mean age, 47 ± 9.9 years; range, 24-68 years) with ESBC underwent whole-body FDG PET/CT and breast MRI prior to operation. SNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were performed on all patients, as was mastectomy or wide local tumor excision. Histopathological findings served as the gold standard when evaluating either multifocality or axillary nodal involvement.ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy, of PET/CT and DCE-MRI, used to detect multifocality, were as follows: 67% versus 78%, 100% versus 53%, 100% versus 50%, 83% versus 80%, and 88% versus 63%. SNB afforded the highest sensitivity (93%) in terms of detection of axillary metastasis. The sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy of PET/CT were 67%, 62%, and 75% respectively, thus higher than the equivalent values of either DCE-MRI or DWI.ConclusionFor assessment of multifocality in ESBC patients, highly specific results of PET/CT should be taken into account along with DCE-MRI findings. For evaluation of axillary nodal involvement, PET/CT has higher sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy values than DCE-MRI and DWI and may guide a surgical decision to proceed or not to SNB or ALND.© The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2014.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.