• S Pesenti, A Ecalle, L Gaubert, E Peltier, E Choufani, E Viehweger, J-L Jouve, and F Launay.
• Orthopédie pédiatrique, Aix-Marseille université, hôpital d'enfants de la Timone, 264, rue Saint-Pierre, 13005 Marseille, France. Electronic address: seb.pesenti@gmail.com.
• Orthop Traumatol Sur. 2017 Sep 1; 103 (5): 771-775.

BackgroundThe best method for stabilising supracondylar humeral fractures (SHFs) in children remains unclear. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of five different fixation methods for SHFs in children.HypothesisDifferences in intra-operative and short-term post-operative parameters can be demonstrated across different fixation methods for SHFs in children.Patients And MethodsWe reviewed the medical files of paediatric patients managed at our centre between 2006 and 2016 for SHF with major displacement (type 3 or 4 in the Lagrange-Rigault classification). Clinical and radiological parameters collected post-operatively and at last follow-up included Baumann's angle, anteversion of the distal humeral epiphysis, and operative time. Over the 11-year study period, 251 patients were included; mean age was 6.4 years and mean follow-up 4.7 months. The five fixation methods used were elastic stable intra-medullary nailing (ESIN, n=16), two pins in an X configuration (n=33), two lateral pins and one medial pin (n=144), two lateral pins (n=33), and three lateral pins (n=25). A minimally invasive 2-cm approach was used to insert the medial pins. Immediate instability of the fixation was considered in patients with an at least 15° deficit in Baumann's angle or anteversion, or with rotational malalignment, on the radiographs taken on day 1. Outcomes were analysed in each of the five internal fixation groups.ResultsImmediate instability showed no significant differences across the five groups. Operative time was significantly shorter with two lateral pins (33min, P=0.046). Time to hardware removal was longer in the ESIN group (54 days, P=0.03). Use of a medial pin was associated with a lower risk of secondary displacement (2.0% vs. 8.6%, P=0.04) but did not affect the risk of nerve injury (4% vs. 3%, P=0.86).DiscussionThis is one of the largest retrospective cohort studies of outcomes according to the fixation technique used to treat SHFs in children. Adding a medial pin through a minimally invasive approach is associated with a longer operative time but limits the risk of secondary displacement without increasing the frequency of iatrogenic nerve injury and improves fracture site stability. Use of a medial pin therefore deserves to be considered in paediatric SHFs.Level Of EvidenceIV, retrospective cohort study.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

30 keywords...

hide…