• Spinal cord · Feb 2011

    Multicenter Study

    SCIM III is reliable and valid in a separate analysis for traumatic spinal cord lesions.

    • V Bluvshtein, L Front, M Itzkovich, E Aidinoff, I Gelernter, J Hart, F Biering-Soerensen, C Weeks, M T Laramee, C Craven, S L Hitzig, E Glaser, G Zeilig, S Aito, G Scivoletto, M Mecci, R J Chadwick, W S El Masry, A Osman, C A Glass, P Silva, B M Soni, B P Gardner, G Savic, E M Bergström, and A Catz.
    • Department IV, Spinal Rehabilitation, Loewenstein Rehabilitation Hospital, Raanana, Israel.
    • Spinal Cord. 2011 Feb 1; 49 (2): 292-6.

    Study DesignA multi-center international cohort study.ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability and validity of the third version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III), separately for patients with traumatic spinal cord lesions (SCLs).SettingA total of 13 spinal cord units in six countries from North America, Europe and the Middle-East.MethodsSCIM III and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were assessed for 261 patients with traumatic SCLs, on admission to rehabilitation and before discharge, by two raters. Conventional statistical measures were used to evaluate the SCIM III reliability and validity.ResultsIn almost all SCIM III tasks, the total agreement between the paired raters was >80%. The κ coefficients were all >0.6 and statistically significant. Pearson's coefficients of the correlations between the paired raters were >0.9, the mean differences between raters were nonsignificant and the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were ≥ 0.95. Cronbach's α values for the entire SCIM III scale were 0.833-0.835. FIM and SCIM III total scores were correlated (r=0.84, P<0.001). SCIM III was more responsive to changes than FIM. In all subscales, SCIM III identified more changes in function than FIM, and in 3 of the 4 subscales, differences in responsiveness were statistically significant (P<0.02).ConclusionThe results confirm the reliability and validity of SCIM III for patients with traumatic SCLs in a number of countries.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.