• Thomas P Meehan, Daniel J Qazi, Thomas J Van Hoof, Shih-Yieh Ho, Sheila Eckenrode, Ann Spenard, Michelle Pandolfi, Florence Johnson, and Deborah Quetti.
• Qualidigm, Wethersfield, CT; Department of Health Sciences, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, North Haven, CT. Electronic address: tmeehan@qualidigm.org.
• J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Aug 1; 16 (8): 648-53.

ObjectiveTo describe and evaluate the impact of quality improvement (QI) support provided to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) by a Quality Improvement Organization (QIO).DesignRetrospective, mixed-method, process evaluation of a QI project intended to decrease preventable hospital readmissions from SNFs.SettingFive SNFs in Connecticut.ParticipantsSNF Administrators, Directors of Nursing, Assistant Directors of Nursing, Admissions Coordinators, Registered Nurses, Certified Nursing Assistants, Receptionists, QIO Quality Improvement Consultant.InterventionQIO staff provided training and technical assistance to SNF administrative and clinical staff to establish or enhance QI infrastructure and implement an established set of QI tools [Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers (INTERACT) tools].MeasurementsBaseline SNF demographic, staffing, and hospital readmission data; baseline and follow-up SNF QI structure (QI Committee), processes (general and use of INTERACT tools), and outcome (30-day all-cause hospital readmission rates); details of QIO-provided training and technical assistance; QIO-perceived barriers to quality improvement; SNF leadership-perceived barriers, accomplishments, and suggestions for improvement of QIO support.ResultsSuccess occurred in establishing QI Committees and targeting preventable hospital readmissions, as well as implementing INTERACT tools in all SNFs; however, hospital readmission rates decreased in only 2 facilities. QIO staff and SNF leaders noted the ongoing challenge of engaging already busy SNF staff and leadership in QI activities. SNF leaders reported that they appreciated the training and technical assistance that their institutions received, although most noted that additional support was needed to bring about improvement in readmission rates.ConclusionThis process evaluation documented mixed clinical results but successfully identified opportunities to improve recruitment of and provision of technical support to participating SNFs. Recommendations are offered for others who wish to conduct similar projects.Copyright © 2015 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. All rights reserved.

10 keywords...

hide…