• Alvaro B Cho, Gustavo Bersani Silva, Marina J Pisani, Jairo A Alves, Raquel B Iamaguchi, Teng H Wei, and Marcelo R de Rezende.
• Hand and Microsurgery Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil.
• Microsurgery. 2019 Jul 1; 39 (5): 400-404.

PurposeElbow flexion deficit is a frequent problem in traumatic brachial plexus injuries and reestablishment of this function is the primary treatment goal. When management is delayed, or the initial acute approach fails, free functional transfer of the gracilis muscle for elbow flexion is the treatment of choice. In this report, the authors present the results of a comparison study on different donor nerves (spinal accessory and ulnar) in elbow flexion reconstruction with gracilis flap for traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries.MethodsRetrospective analysis of patients with both total or partial traumatic brachial plexus injuries was carried out. Of the 38 patients enrolled, 37 were male (97.4%) with a mean age of 28.3 years. The mean follow-up period was 25 months. Postoperative function of the gracilis muscle flap was recorded and patients were divided into two groups according to donor nerve: spinal accessory nerve (SAN) (18 cases), and motor fascicles of the ulnar (ULNAR) (20 cases).ResultsTwenty-six cases obtained elbow flexion strength M3 or M4 (68.4%): 0 M0 (0.0%), 4 M1 (10.5%), 8 M2 (21.1%), 9 M3 (23.7%) and 17 M4 (44.7%). The mean interval to first recorded M3 muscular strength was 12.4 months. Functional elbow flexion strength (≥ M3) had the following distribution: SAN 83.3% (15/18) and ULNAR 55.0% (11/20) (p = .086).ConclusionNo statistical difference for final muscle strength was found between donor nerve groups.© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

41 keywords...

hide…