• J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. · Aug 2008

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Computer-assisted instruction versus traditional lecture for medical student teaching of dermatology morphology: a randomized control trial.

    • Sasha Jenkins, Ruchika Goel, and Dean S Morrell.
    • Department of Dermatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7287, USA.
    • J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2008 Aug 1; 59 (2): 255-9.

    BackgroundThe effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction is unproven.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of an online computerized dermatology module compared to traditional lecture-based teaching to medical students.MethodsMedical students were randomized to two groups. Group 1 of 37 students had access to a computer-based dermatology tutorial. Group 2 of 36 students attended a lecture on skin morphology, identical to the tutorial, given by a dermatology faculty member. The main outcome was the total number of correct answers on a multiple-choice morphologic terminology final examination. The mean number of questions answered correctly was 16.14 and 14.89 for group 1 and group 2, respectively.ResultsUnpaired statistical t tests showed the difference in mean scores between the two groups to be 1.25 (95% confidence interval: -0.70 to 3.20, p value = .20).LimitationsThe study was small, with a small amount of material, and was brief in duration.ConclusionsWithin the limits of our study, computer-assisted instruction is at least as effective as traditional lecture teaching of dermatology morphology to medical students.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…