• Spine · Jun 2008

    Comparative Study

    Revision of loosened iliac screws: a biomechanical study of longer and bigger screws.

    • Burak Akesen, Chunhui Wu, Amir A Mehbod, Mark Sokolowski, and Ensor E Transfeldt.
    • Twin Cities Spine Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
    • Spine. 2008 Jun 1; 33 (13): 1423-8.

    Study DesignThe present study compared the biomechanics of 2 revision iliac screws: longer and bigger screws, on human cadaveric pelves.ObjectiveTo determine if a bigger screw resists loosening under cyclic loading better than a longer screw in revising loosened iliac screws.Summary Of Background DataIliac screws have been used in treating spinal deformity, spondylolisthesis and many other spinal diseases. Because of the cancellous bone along the screw trajectory, screw loosening over cyclic loading has been experienced in clinical applications. Two popular revision choices are: a longer screw and a bigger screw. However, their biomechanics has not been characterized. The objective of this study is to determine the rate of loosening of longer or larger revision iliac screws under cyclic loading.MethodsEight pairs of human cadaver pelves were harvested. Each side was randomly assigned for a longer revision screw or a larger revision screw. Because of different bone quality in each specimen, applied load was varied according to the peak insertion torque of the primary iliac screws. The load was applied at an anatomic angle with a frequency of 2 Hz. The motion of screw with respect to the pelvis at the bone entry point was recorded with a motion tracking system. The amount of loosening after a specific number of cycles was determined from the screw motion data.ResultsThe average maximal insertion torque of bigger revision screws (3.2 Nm) was greater than that of longer revision screws (2.7 Nm) with P = 0.03. The average loosening rate was 0.28 +/- 0.13 (SE) mm/thousand cycles for longer revision screws and 0.06 +/- 0.05 (SE) mm/thousand cycles for bigger revision screws. The difference between these 2 revision screws was significant (P = 0.03). In addition, the bigger revision screws had a lower loosening rate than that of the primary screws (P = 0.03).ConclusionIliac screws are susceptible to loosening under cyclic loading due to the cancellous bone structure surrounding the screw body. Experimental data showed that the bigger revision iliac screw resists loosening better than the longer screw and the primary screw. Thus, the bigger revision screw is favored if the patient's anatomy allows such operation.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…