• BMJ open · Oct 2020

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Effect of a real-time feedback smartphone application (TCPRLink) on the quality of telephone-assisted CPR performed by trained laypeople in China: a manikin-based randomised controlled study.

    • Xuejie Dong, Lin Zhang, Helge Myklebust, Tonje Soraas Birkenes, and Zhi-Jie Zheng.
    • School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
    • BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 5; 10 (10): e038813.

    ObjectivesTo determine the effect of a free smartphone application (TCPRLink) that provides real-time monitoring and audiovisual feedback on chest compressions (CC) on trained layperson telephone-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) performance.DesignA manikin-based randomised controlled study.SettingThis study was conducted at a multidisciplinary university and a community centre in China.ParticipantsOne hundred and eighty-six adult participants (age 18-65 years) with T-CPR training experience were randomly assigned to the TCPRLink (n=94) and T-CPR (n=92) groups with age stratification.InterventionsWe compared the participants' performance for 6 min of CC in a simulated T-CPR scenario both at the baseline and after 3 months.Primary And Secondary Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcomes were the CC rate and proportion of adequate CC rate (100-120 min-1). The secondary outcomes included the proportion of participants counting the CC rhythm, time to first CC, CC depth, hands-off time and CC full-release ratio.ResultsParticipants in the TCPRLink feedback group more consistently performed CC with higher rate, both initially and 3 months later (median 111 (IQR 109-113) vs 108 (103-112) min-1, p=0.002 and 111 (109-113) vs 108 (105-112) min-1, p<0.001, respectively), with less need to count the rhythm (21.3% vs 41.3%, p=0.003% and 7% vs 22.6%, p=0.004, respectively) compared with the T-CPR group. There were no significant differences in time to the first CC, hands-off time or CC full-release ratio. Among 55-65 year group, the CC depth was deeper in the TCPRLink group than in the TCPR group (47.1±9.6 vs 38.5±8.7 mm, p=0.001 and 44.7±10.1 vs 39.3±10.8 mm, p=0.07, respectively).ConclusionsThe TCPRLink application improved T-CPR quality in trained laypersons to provide more effective CCs and lighten the load of counting out the CC with the dispatcher in a simulated T-CPR scenario. Further investigations are required to confirm this effectiveness in real-life resuscitation attempts.© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.