• Y Delannoy, B Averland, G Tournel, R Cornez, J Pollard, V Hedouin, and D Gosset.
• Faculté de médecine Henri-Warembourg, université Lille-Nord de France, institut de médecine légale et de médecine sociale de Lille, place de Verdun, 59045 Lille cedex, France. yann.delannoy@univ-lille2.fr
• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2013 Jan 1;32(1):7-11.

ObjectiveThere is a chronic shortage of transplants. There are many obstacles on organ procurement and some are related to forensics aspects of deaths. In these situations in France, the judge decides whether or not to perform the organ recovery. These refusals are about 40 donors per year, representing a loss of more than 120 potential transplants.Study DesignRetrospective study of 9 years (2003-2011) aimed to study the expectations of judges in comparing them with forensics issues.Patients And MethodsSixty-two cases of organ recovery with judicial proceedings have been treated in collaboration between the Agency of Biomedicine (Northeast) and the Medico-Legal Institute of Lille (northern France).ResultsWhen there is a judicial opposition to an organ procurement, it is mostly upon criminal circumstances (57%). The main reason is the need to perform an autopsy (38%), raising fears of a loss of evidence because of resuscitation and surgery for the judges. However, autopsies rule out these problems if strict protocols are followed.ConclusionsIn case of forensic death, French law provides that a forensic examination to take place prior to surgical procedures. The law also provides for collaboration between caregivers and medical examiners. Nevertheless, judicial oppositions persist and appear to belong to a lack of communication between actors (judges/medical examiners/organ procurement organization). Better collaboration through protocols must be thought to satisfy the demands of justice and public health.Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier SAS.

14 keywords...

hide…