• Clin J Am Soc Nephrol · Oct 2016

    Comparative Study

    Renal Survival in Patients with Collapsing Compared with Not Otherwise Specified FSGS.

    • Louis-Philippe Laurin, Adil M Gasim, Vimal K Derebail, JulieAnne G McGregor, Jason M Kidd, Susan L Hogan, Caroline J Poulton, Randal K Detwiler, J Charles Jennette, Ronald J Falk, and Patrick H Nachman.
    • University of North Carolina Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension and.
    • Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Oct 7; 11 (10): 1752-1759.

    Background And ObjectivesIdiopathic collapsing FSGS has historically been associated with poor renal outcomes. Minimal clinical data exist on the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy. Our study sought to provide a comprehensive description of renal survival in patients with collapsing and not otherwise specified FSGS after controlling for factors affecting renal prognosis.Design, Setting, Participants, & MeasurementsWe performed a retrospective analysis of an inception cohort study of patients diagnosed between 1989 and 2012. All potential patients with collapsing FSGS fulfilling the inclusion criteria were identified and compared with patients with not otherwise specified FSGS (approximately 1:2 ratio) on the basis of biopsy report and record availability. Time to ESRD was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsIn total, 187 patients were studied (61 collapsing and 126 not otherwise specified), with a mean follow-up of 96 months. At baseline, patients with collapsing FSGS had higher median proteinuria (12.2 [5.6-14.8] versus 4.4 [2.3-8.1] g/d, respectively; P<0.001), lower median albuminemia (2.4 [1.9-3.0] versus 2.9 [1.8-3.7] g/dl, respectively; P=0.12), and lower median eGFR (48 [26-73] versus 60 [42-92] ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively; P=0.01) than patients with not otherwise specified FSGS. The proportion of patients with remission of proteinuria was similar in patients with collapsing FSGS and patients with not otherwise specified FSGS (65.7% [23 of 35] versus 63.2% [72 of 114], respectively; P=0.84). The overall renal outcome (ESRD defined as eGFR<15 ml/min per 1.73 m2, dialysis, or transplantation) of patients with collapsing FSGS was not poorer than that of patients with not otherwise specified FSGS in multivariate analyses after adjusting for baseline characteristics and immunotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 3.45).ConclusionsCompared with not otherwise specified FSGS, idiopathic collapsing FSGS presented with more severe nephrotic syndrome and lower eGFR but had a similar renal survival after controlling for exposure to immunosuppressive treatment. These results highlight the importance of early diagnosis and institution of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with collapsing FSGS.Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Nephrology.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.