-
Comparative Study
[Laparoscopic treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer].
- B Alamowitch, K Aouad, P Sellam, J Fourmestraux, P Gasne, J P Bethoux, and J L Bouillot.
- Pôle de Chirurgie Viscérale, Service de Chirurgie, Hôtel-Dieu, Paris.
- Gastroen Clin Biol. 2000 Nov 1; 24 (11): 1012-7.
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine if laparoscopic simple closure for perforated duodenal ulcer is possible, efficient and safe.MethodsThirty-five consecutive patients with perforated duodenal ulcer and peritonitis were treated by simple closure, peritoneal lavage and omentoplasty. This treatment was performed laparoscopically.ResultsDiagnosis was confirmed in all cases. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in two patients due to a technical problem and poor tolerance to pneumoperitoneum, respectively. Mean operative time was 120 min. Morbidity and mortality rates were 2.8%. Mean hospital stay was 7.8 days. No recurrence was found after eradication of Helicobacter pylori with a long-term follow-up of 38 months.ConclusionLaparoscopic suture of perforated duodenal ulcer is possible and safe. It can avoid laparotomy with septic complications in peritonitis. In emergency there is no place for radical treatment of ulcer disease because of efficiency of medical treatment.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.