-
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue · Aug 2019
Meta Analysis[Early white blood cell count in predicting mortality after acute paraquat poisoning: a Meta-analysis].
- Yibing Li, Honghua Zhang, and Guoxiu Zhang.
- Department of Emergency, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, Henan, China.
- Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Aug 1; 31 (8): 1013-1017.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the prognostic value of early white blood cell count (WBC) in patient of acute paraquat poisoning.MethodsThe literatures about the studies on early WBC and prognosis after paraquat poisoning published in journals at home and abroad were searched. The Chinese literature database contained CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Database, and China Biomedicine Database (CBM), and the journals were limited to the core journals. The foreign language database included PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library clinical controlled trial database. The retrieval date was from the initial publication to April 22nd in 2019, without the limitation of languages. Two researchers independently extracted literature information, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate literature quality. The odds ratio (OR), sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) were combined and analyzed through the Stata 15.0 software to evaluate the predictive value of early WBC after acute paraquat poisoning. Publication bias was analyzed by Deeks funnel graph.ResultsThere were 7 retrospective studies and 1 prospective study in a total of 980 paraquat poisoning patients, 5 of them were English literatures, the others were Chinese literatures. There was no heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 43.5%, P > 0.05). The OR and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of the literature was combined through the fixed effect model. The Meta-analysis results were statistically significant (OR = 18.63, 95%CI = 13.63-25.48, P < 0.001), suggesting that the WBC was significantly correlated with the mortality of patients. The combined sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR were 0.75 (95%CI = 0.66-0.82), 0.85 (95%CI = 0.80-0.90), 5.14 (95%CI = 3.86-6.86), 0.29 (95%CI = 0.22-0.39), 17.53 (95%CI = 12.23-25.13) respectively, and the area under the SROC of the WBC was 0.88 (95%CI = 0.85-0.91). Deeks funnel plot was symmetrical (P = 0.21), and there was no obvious publication bias.ConclusionsThe early WBC has a certain predictive value for the prognosis of acute paraquat poisoning patients.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.