• F Espitalier, M Barbaz, J Fusciardi, and M Laffon.
• Service d'anesthésie-réanimation II, hôpital Trousseau, CHRU de Tours, 37044 Tours cedex 9, France. Electronic address: fabien.espitalier@chu-tours.fr.
• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2013 Sep 1;32(9):554-9.

ObjectiveThe variability of the medical information available on the Internet (MedInfoWeb) raises concern about its quality. There is no data about the quality of MedInfoWeb concerning epidural analgesia for labour (EAL). Our aims were to assess the quality of MedInfoWeb concerning EAL and to study the stability of MedInfoWeb and the ranking of website into search engine (SE) during 1year.Study DesignObservational study.Materials And MethodsWe created our own data form to analyse the firsts 40 Google(®), Alta Vista(®) and Yahoo(®) websites. In 2009 and 2010, two independent assessors assessed the quality of the website structure (structure score noted out of 25) and the quality of medical information (medical score noted out of 30). The global score (noted on 55) was the addition of structure and medical scores. A HONcode labelling was noted.ResultsBetween 2009 and 2010, the average global (23 vs. 22), structure (11 vs. 11) and medical (12 vs. 12) Scores were stable. The SE's quality was comparable. A SE website's rank was not related to its global score. The labelling HONcode websites were the best (26 vs. 21, P=0.048). The best website in 2009 and 2010 was doctissimo.fr. In 2010, only 58% of the websites were still presents.ConclusionThe quality of MedInfoWeb concerning EAL is poor and did not improve between 2009 and 2010. The MedInfoWeb is unstable: 42% of the websites disappeared in 1year. No website or SE is currently able to give reliable medical information concerning EAL.Copyright © 2013 Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

29 keywords...

hide…