-
Int J Qual Health Care · Feb 2018
Developing a set of indicators to monitor quality in ambulatory diabetes care using a modified Delphi panel process.
- Geetha Mukerji, Ilana Halperin, Katie Hunter, Phillip Segal, Maria Wolfs, Lindsay Bevan, Lianne Jeffs, and Jeannette Goguen.
- Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1B2, Canada.
- Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Feb 1; 30 (1): 65-74.
ObjectiveThere is a large evidence to practice gap in diabetes care with limited performance assessments that capture the full spectrum of care delivery. Our study aimed to develop a set of ambulatory diabetes quality indicators across six domains (effectiveness, safety, patient-centered, timely, equitable and efficient) to provide a broad view of quality.DesignA modified Delphi panel process was conducted. Phase I involved compiling a list of indicators through literature review and generation of patient and healthcare provider-derived indicators through interviews and surveys, respectively. Phase II involved panelists rating indicators using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality measure attributes on 9-point Likert scale, attending a face-to-face meeting followed by re-rating, and final ranking.SettingThis study was conducted across five adult academic medical centers affiliated with the University of Toronto.ParticipantsA multi-disciplinary Delphi panel (n = 16) including patients was assembled.Main Outcome MeasureFor indicator advancement for ranking, ≥75% of panelists' responses in the top tertile (between 7 and 9) with a median composite score of ≥7 was required.ResultsThere were 202 indicators included in the Delphi panel process including 171 from a comprehensive literature review, 14 from patient interviews, and 17 from healthcare provider surveys. Following the first round, 40 indicators proceeded directly to ranking, while 162 indicators were re-rated and distilled down to 12 for ranking. In the final ranking round, the 52 indicators were reduced to 35 including 13 effective, 10 safe, 6 patient-centered, 1 equitable, 3 efficient and 2 timely indicators.ConclusionThirty-five selected indicators developed with broad stakeholder engagement can be used to monitor quality in diabetes care.© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.