• Clin Lab · Jan 2004

    Review Comparative Study

    Comparison of cardiac troponin T and troponin I assays--implications of analytical and biochemical differences on clinical performance.

    • Evangelos Giannitsis and Hugo A Katus.
    • Abteilung Innere Medizin III, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg. evangelos.giannitsis@med.uni-heidelberg.de
    • Clin Lab. 2004 Jan 1; 50 (9-10): 521-8.

    AbstractThe usefulness of cardiac troponins for detection of myocardial cell necrosis and risk stratification has been established beyond doubt. Cardiac troponin testing is a key diagnostic element for the diagnosis and management of patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST segment elevation and is increasingly used in non-coronary diseases to indicate prognostically important cardiac damage. Given the biochemical and analytical differences of cTnT and cTnI there is ongoing controversy regarding the comparability and clinical performance of cTnT and cTnI. cTnT and cTnI are both expressed in cardiomyocytes but differ with respect to biochemical and analytical characteristics. While minor differences of analytical precision or biochemical properties are not relevant for diagnosis and management of patients with acute coronary syndromes and most diseases with non-coronary related elevations of cardiac troponins, these differences may be amplified in patients with chronic renal failure. In fact, recent studies in patients with end-stage renal disease under chronic hemodialysis have readdressed the issue whether cTnT and cTnI are really comparable. The present review will provide a state-of-the-art overview on the performance of cardiac troponins in acute coronary disease and other clinical conditions.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…