• Thomas Grüning, Rebecca E Mingo, Matthew G Gosling, Sally L Farrell, Brent E Drake, Robert J Loader, and Richard D Riordan.
• 1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK.
• Br J Radiol. 2016 Jun 1; 89 (1062): 20160021.

ObjectiveWe report the imaging outcomes of all pregnant patients referred for suspected thromboembolism over a 43-month period.MethodsWe identified 168 patients who underwent ventilation/perfusion (VQ) single-photon emission CT (SPECT), CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) or a Doppler ultrasound scan of the lower legs, as well as a control group of 89 non-pregnant age- and sex-matched patients who underwent VQ SPECT during the same period. Imaging outcomes were recorded, and radiation doses were calculated for individual patients.ResultsVQ SPECT and CTPA were equally likely to diagnose pulmonary embolism (PE) in about one patient out of every seven patients investigated. One in three CTPA scans was of suboptimal quality. A Doppler ultrasound examination of the legs will find deep venous thrombosis much less often, in about 1 patient out of every 15 patients investigated. The prevalence of PE in pregnant patients (as diagnosed by VQ SPECT) was similar to that in the non-pregnant, age- and sex-matched control group. The effective dose and the absorbed radiation dose to the maternal breast were lower with VQ SPECT. The foetal dose is comparable for both VQ SPECT and CTPA.ConclusionVQ SPECT and CTPA provide a similar diagnostic yield for diagnosing PE during pregnancy, but VQ SPECT does so with a lower radiation dose to the mother (effective dose and breast dose).Advances In KnowledgeOurs is the first report of the diagnostic performance of VQ SPECT, rather than planar VQ scans, in pregnancy in a routine clinical setting.

27 keywords...

hide…