• Craig M Nelson and Blanca Arriola Nazareth.
• Director of Medical Bioethics at the South Bay Medical Center in Harbor City, CA. E-mail: craig.m.nelson@kp.org.
• Perm J. 2013 Jan 1; 17 (3): 23-7.

IntroductionWe established a fair and explicit nonbeneficial treatment and conflict resolution policy at our medical center. The policy was designed to help us acknowledge and respect both patients and clinicians involved in treatment planning and decision making.ObjectiveTo qualitatively describe how our hospitalwide nonbeneficial treatment and conflict resolution policy was used.DesignRetrospective evaluation of all bioethics consultations from November 6, 2009, when the policy was adopted, through August 6, 2012. Case-specific data were obtained when nonconsensus occurred involving withholding or withdrawing of nonbeneficial treatment.Main Outcome MeasuresRates of resolution of conflicts and treatment plan consensus when nonbeneficial treatment was withheld or withdrawn.ResultsWe identified 146 (39.4%) cases where there was a treatment-level conflict between patients/surrogates and the treatment teams responsible for their care. In 54 (37.0%) of the cases, resolution occurred. In 92 (63.0%) of the cases, nonbeneficial treatment was eventually withheld or withdrawn. In 87 (94.6%) of the cases where treatment was withheld or withdrawn, the treatment teams and patients/surrogates reached consensus by the conclusion of the bioethics consultation process using the fair and explicit nonbeneficial treatment and conflict resolution policy.ConclusionA fair and explicit nonbeneficial treatment and conflict resolution policy can result in a high level of consensus between patients/surrogates and the treatment teams responsible for their care when treatment is withheld or withdrawn.

19 keywords...

hide…