• Firas Mosavi, Silvia Johansson, Dan T Sandberg, Ingela Turesson, Jens Sörensen, and Håkan Ahlström.
• Department of Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. firas.mosavi@akademiska.se
• AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov 1; 199 (5): 1114-20.

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and (18)F-NaF PET/CT for detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.Subjects And MethodsBoth patient- and lesion-based analyses were performed on 49 consecutive patients (median age, 67 years; age range, 57-80 years) with recently diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer. All patients underwent bone scintigraphy, whole-body MRI including DWI and (18)F-NaF PET/CT before treatment. Bone scintigraphy, conventional MR images, and follow-up images were used as the standard of reference to evaluate (18)F-NaF PET/CT and DWI.ResultsOn patient-based analysis, five patients had skeletal metastases on reference imaging that both DWI and (18)F-NaF PET/CT could verify, and (18)F-NaF PET/CT and DWI showed false-positive findings in four and one patient, respectively. With lesion-based analysis, (18)F-NaF PET/CT and DWI showed nine and five true-positive lesions, zero and four false-negative lesions, and seven and two false-positive lesions, respectively. Two patients with uncountable bone metastases were analyzed separately. In these patients, (18)F-NaF PET/CT showed more bone metastases than did DWI.ConclusionWe believe (18)F-NaF PET/CT is a sensitive modality for detection of bone metastases caused by prostate cancer. Whole-body DWI shows a higher specificity but lower sensitivity than (18)F-NaF PET/CT. Future studies with a larger patient cohort along with analyses of costs and clinical availability are needed before implementation of these methods can be considered.

25 keywords...

hide…