-
Clin Neurol Neurosurg · Oct 2015
Long-term follow-up study of 35 cases after endovascular treatment for vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms.
- Yizheng Zang, Chengwei Wang, Yuan Zhang, Xuan Ding, Yihua Wang, Xiaofei Wang, and Zhigang Wang.
- Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Hospital, Shandong University, No. 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan 250033, China.
- Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Oct 1; 137: 121-31.
ObjectiveVertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysm (VBDA) management is challenging despite the availability of multiple treatment strategies. We reviewed our experiences using endovascular treatment for VBDA patients to assess the efficacy and safety of several VBDA treatment strategies.MethodsAssisted by intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, 35 patients in our hospital were treated using various VBDA treatment strategies, including stent-assisted coil embolization (20 patients), placement of single or multiple overlapping stents (5 patients) or coil embolization combined with proximal coil trapping of the dissected segment of the parent artery (CE+PT; 10 patients). We retrospectively reviewed the perioperative records of all 35 patients and the post-procedure angiographic and clinical outcomes of 31 available patients.ResultsOf the 25 cases with ruptured VBDAs, 14 underwent stent-assisted coil embolization, 2 underwent multiple overlapping stent placement and 9 underwent CE+PT. Perioperative complications occurred in four cases (16.0%), including one aneurysm rupture and one parent artery thrombosis during the procedure and two incidences of brainstem ischemia after the procedure. Clinical outcome evaluations were performed using the Modified Rankin Scale and resulted in the following scores: 0-2 for 22 patients (22/25, 88.0%), 5 for one patient (1/25, 4.0%) and 6 for two patients (2/25, 8.0%). No cerebral bleeding events or deaths occurred during the follow-up period. Of the 10 cases with unruptured VBDAs, six underwent stent-assisted coil embolization, three underwent single or multiple overlapping stent placement and one patient underwent CE+PT. All 10 of the patients with unruptured VBDAs had favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes without procedure-related complications.ConclusionsFor patients with ruptured VBDAs, the complication rate associated with endovascular treatment is acceptable. CE+PT is better than stent coiling in preventing aneurysmal rerupture, but is associated with a high incidence of ischemic stroke. For unruptured VBDAs, endovascular treatment is associated with good clinical outcome without perioperative complications, including rerupture and ischemic stroke. However, the high postoperative recurrent aneurysm risk suggests the necessity of long-term angiographic follow-up monitoring of VBDA patients who undergo endovascular treatments.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.