• Anja Müller-Lutz, Tom Cronenberg, Christoph Schleich, Frithjof Wickrath, Moritz Zaiss, Johannes Boos, and Hans-Jörg Wittsack.
• University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Dusseldorf, Germany.
• Magn Reson Med. 2017 Jul 1; 78 (1): 280-284.

PurposeTo investigate, if a train of spin-lock pulses (chemical exchange saturation transfer with spin-lock pulses = CESL) improves biochemical glycosaminoglycan imaging compared with conventional chemical exchange saturation transfer with Gaussian-shaped pulses (CEST) in lumbar intervertebral discs.MethodsT2 , CEST, and CESL imaging was performed in lumbar intervertebral discs of 15 healthy volunteers at 3 Tesla. Mean and standard deviation of the asymmetric magnetization transfer ratio (MTRasym ), the asymmetric spin-lock ratio (SLRasym ) and T2 values were calculated for nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF). Wilcoxon test was used to analyze differences between MTRasym and SLRasym . Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between MTRasym , SLRasym and T2 .ResultsData showed no significant difference between MTRasym and SLRasym (NP: P = 0.35; AF: P = 0.34). MTRasym and SLRasym values differed significantly between NP and AF (MTRasym : P = 0.014, SLRasym : P = 0.005). T2 values correlated significantly with MTRasym (NP: ρ = 0.76, P < 0.001; AF: ρ = 0.60, P < 0.001) and SLRasym (NP: ρ = 0.73, P < 0.001; AF: ρ = 0.47, P < 0.001).ConclusionCESL does not improve the chemical exchange asymmetry effect compared with conventional CEST, but leads to comparable results. Magn Reson Med 78:280-284, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.© 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

33 keywords...

hide…