• J Magn Reson Imaging · Jan 2020

    Deep learning enables automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases on multisequence MRI.

    • Endre Grøvik, Darvin Yi, Michael Iv, Elizabeth Tong, Daniel Rubin, and Greg Zaharchuk.
    • Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Jan 1; 51 (1): 175-182.

    BackgroundDetecting and segmenting brain metastases is a tedious and time-consuming task for many radiologists, particularly with the growing use of multisequence 3D imaging.PurposeTo demonstrate automated detection and segmentation of brain metastases on multisequence MRI using a deep-learning approach based on a fully convolution neural network (CNN).Study TypeRetrospective.PopulationIn all, 156 patients with brain metastases from several primary cancers were included.Field Strength1.5T and 3T. [Correction added on May 24, 2019, after first online publication: In the preceding sentence, the first field strength listed was corrected.] SEQUENCE: Pretherapy MR images included pre- and postgadolinium T1 -weighted 3D fast spin echo (CUBE), postgadolinium T1 -weighted 3D axial IR-prepped FSPGR (BRAVO), and 3D CUBE fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR).AssessmentThe ground truth was established by manual delineation by two experienced neuroradiologists. CNN training/development was performed using 100 and 5 patients, respectively, with a 2.5D network based on a GoogLeNet architecture. The results were evaluated in 51 patients, equally separated into those with few (1-3), multiple (4-10), and many (>10) lesions.Statistical TestsNetwork performance was evaluated using precision, recall, Dice/F1 score, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve statistics. For an optimal probability threshold, detection and segmentation performance was assessed on a per-metastasis basis. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to test the differences between patient subgroups.ResultsThe area under the ROC curve (AUC), averaged across all patients, was 0.98 ± 0.04. The AUC in the subgroups was 0.99 ± 0.01, 0.97 ± 0.05, and 0.97 ± 0.03 for patients having 1-3, 4-10, and >10 metastases, respectively. Using an average optimal probability threshold determined by the development set, precision, recall, and Dice score were 0.79 ± 0.20, 0.53 ± 0.22, and 0.79 ± 0.12, respectively. At the same probability threshold, the network showed an average false-positive rate of 8.3/patient (no lesion-size limit) and 3.4/patient (10 mm3 lesion size limit).Data ConclusionA deep-learning approach using multisequence MRI can automatically detect and segment brain metastases with high accuracy.Level Of Evidence3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:175-182.© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.