• Med. J. Aust. · Feb 1992

    Diagnosis and treatment of confirmed and suspected snake bite. Implications from an analysis of 46 paediatric cases.

    • J Tibballs.
    • Intensive Care Unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC.
    • Med. J. Aust. 1992 Feb 17; 156 (4): 270-4.

    ObjectiveTo identify reliable predictors of envenomation in suspected snake bite and to examine the current standard of treatment in envenomed patients.DesignRetrospective cohort analysis of children presenting with suspected or confirmed snake bite in southern mainland Australia. Detection of snake venom in urine or blood was taken as proof of envenomation.SettingIntensive Care Unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne.PatientsForty-six children presenting between 1979 and 1990.Main Outcome MeasuresPositive and negative clinical evidence, venom tests, and coagulation tests.ResultsTwenty-seven children (59%) had suspected bites; 10 (22%) were bitten but not envenomed; 9 (19%) were envenomed. Two died of coagulopathy. Headache, abdominal pain or vomiting were moderately predictive of envenomation (positive predictive values of 63%, 57% and 64% respectively). Coagulopathy was a highly sensitive, specific and reliably predictive (100%) indicator of envenomation. The pressure-immobilisation bandage was used in 28% of cases at the scene of the bite and in 41% on contact with medical or paramedical services. Twelve patients received antivenom; of these, six received adrenaline as premedication.ConclusionHeadache, abdominal pain, nausea or vomiting, or abnormal coagulation tests accurately predict envenomation by snakes in southern mainland Australia. More or better education on first aid and clinical management of snake bite is needed.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…