• NeuroImage · Jan 2014

    Comparative Study

    Effects of study design in multi-scanner voxel-based morphometry studies.

    • Hidemasa Takao, Naoto Hayashi, and Kuni Ohtomo.
    • Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: takaoh-tky@umin.ac.jp.
    • Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1; 84: 133-40.

    AbstractInterest has recently grown in multi-center studies, which have more power than smaller studies in conducting sophisticated evaluations of basic neuroanatomy and neurodegenerative disorders. The large number of subjects that result from pooling multi-center datasets increases sensitivity, but also introduces a between-center variance component. Taking sex differences as an example, we examined the effects of different ratios of cases to controls (males to females) between scanners in multi-scanner morphometric studies, using voxel-based morphometry and data obtained on two scanners of the exact same model. Each subject was scanned twice with both scanners. Using the image obtained on either of the two scanners for each subject, voxel-based analyses were repeated with different ratios of males to females for each scanner. As the ratio of males to females became more imbalanced between the scanners, the differences between the two scanners more strongly affected the results of analyses of sex differences. When the ratio of males to females was balanced, the inclusion of scanner as a covariate in the statistical analysis had almost no influence on the results of analyses of sex differences. When the ratio of males to females was ill-balanced, the inclusion of scanner as a covariate suppressed scanner effects on the results, but made sex differences less likely to become significant. The present results suggest that as long as the ratio of cases to controls is well-balanced across different scanners, it is not always necessary to include scanner as a covariate in the statistical analysis, and that when the ratio of cases to controls is ill-balanced across scanners, the inclusion of scanner as a covariate in the statistical analysis can suppress scanner effects, but may make differences less likely to be detected. © 2013.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.