-
J Trauma Acute Care Surg · Mar 2021
Nationwide cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical stabilization of rib fractures by flail chest status and age groups.
- Jeff Choi, Bianca Mulaney, Wasin Laohavinij, Richard Trimble, Lakshika Tennakoon, David A Spain, Joshua A Salomon, Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert, and Joseph D Forrester.
- From the Department of Surgery (J.C., L.T., D.A.S., J.D.F.), Division of General Surgery, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health (J.C.), Surgeons Writing About Trauma (J.C., B.M., R.T., L.T., D.A.S., J.D.F.), and School of Medicine (B.M., R.T.), Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Surgery, Chulalongkorn University (W.L.), Bangkok, Thailand; and Stanford Health Policy (J.A.S., J.D.G.-F.), Centers for Health Policy and Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
- J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Mar 1; 90 (3): 451-458.
BackgroundSurgical stabilization of rib fracture (SSRF) is increasingly used to manage patients with rib fractures. Benefits of performing SSRF appear variable, and the procedure is costly, necessitating cost-effectiveness analysis for distinct subgroups. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of SSRF versus nonoperative management among patients with rib fractures younger than 65 years versus 65 years or older, with versus without flail chest. We hypothesized that, compared with nonoperative management, SSRF is cost-effective only for patients with flail chest.MethodsThis economic evaluation used a decision-analytic Markov model with a lifetime time horizon incorporating US population-representative inputs to simulate benefits and risks of SSRF compared with nonoperative management. We report quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses accounted for most plausible clinical scenarios.ResultsCompared with nonoperative management, SSRF was cost-effective for patients with flail chest at willingness-to-pay threshold of US $150,000/QALY gained. Surgical stabilization of rib fracture costs US $25,338 and US $123,377/QALY gained for those with flail chest younger than 65 years and 65 years or older, respectively. Surgical stabilization of rib fracture was not cost-effective for patients without flail chest, costing US $172,704 and US $243,758/QALY gained for those younger than 65 years and 65 years or older, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that, under most plausible scenarios, SSRF remained cost-effective for subgroups with flail chest, and nonoperative management remained cost-effective for patients older than 65 years without flail chest. Probability that SSRF is cost-effective ranged from 98% among patients younger than 65 years with flail chest to 35% among patients 65 years or older without flail chest.ConclusionsSurgical stabilization of rib fracture is cost-effective for patients with flail chest. Surgical stabilization of rib fracture may be cost-effective in some patients without flail chest, but delineating these patients requires further study.Level Of EvidenceEconomic/decision, level II.Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.