• Jacob A Blythe, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Anne-Sophie Debue, Daniel Dohan, Elie Azoulay, Ken Covinsky, Thea Matthews, CurtisJ RandallJRDivision of Pulmonary (R.C.), Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence (R.C., and Elizabeth Dzeng.
• Stanford University School of Medicine (J.A.B.), Stanford, California, USA.
• J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jan 1; 63 (1): 160-170.

ContextThe provision of potentially non-beneficial life-sustaining treatments (LSTs) remains a challenging problem. In 2005, legislation in France established an interprofessional process by which non-beneficial LSTs could be withheld or withdrawn, permitting exploration of the effects of such a legally-protected process and its implementation.ObjectivesTo characterize intensive care unit (ICU) interprofessional team decision-making and consensus-building practices regarding withholding and withdrawing of LSTs in two Parisian hospitals and to explore physician and nurse perceptions of and experiences with these practices.MethodsThis was an exploratory qualitative study utilizing thematic analysis of semi-structured, in-depth interviews of physicians and nurses purposively sampled based on level of training and experience from two hospitals in Paris, France.ResultsA total of 25 participants were interviewed. Participants reported that the two Parisian hospitals in this study have each created an interprofessional process for withholding or withdrawing non-beneficial LSTs, providing insight into how norms of decision-making respond to systems-level legal changes. Participants reported that these processes tended to be consistent across several domains: maintaining unified messaging with patients, empowering nurses to participate in end-of-life decision-making, reducing moral distress provoked by end-of-life decisions, and shaping the ethical milieu within which end-of-life decision-making takes place.ConclusionsThe architecture of the interprofessional process created at two Parisian hospitals and its perceived benefits may be useful to clinicians and policy-makers attempting to establish processes, policies, or legislation directed at withholding or withdrawing potentially non-beneficial LSTs in the United States and elsewhere.Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. All rights reserved.

13 keywords...

hide…