• Acta radiologica · May 2009

    Comparative Study

    Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: comparison between a Gd-BOPTA- and a Gd-DTPA-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequence and a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession sequence.

    • K Nassenstein, F Breuckmann, P Hunold, J Barkhausen, and T Schlosser.
    • Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, West German Heart Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. kai.nassenstein@uni-due.de
    • Acta Radiol. 2009 May 1; 50 (4): 406-11.

    BackgroundSeveral studies have demonstrated that the administration of contrast agents is advantageous in magnetic resonance coronary angiography (MRCA).PurposeTo compare a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession (SSFP) with a contrast-enhanced inversion recovery spoiled gradient-echo (IR-GE) sequence using two different contrast agents for MRCA.Material And MethodsEight healthy volunteers were examined on a 1.5T MR scanner. For non-contrast-enhanced MRCA, a breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) SSFP sequence (repetition/echo time [TR/TE] 3.9/1.7 ms, flip angle [FA] 65 degrees) was used. Contrast-enhanced MRCA was performed repetitively in two imaging sessions over 30 min after injection of 0.2 mmol/kg body weight gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) or gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) using a breath-hold 3D IR-GE sequence (TR/TE 4.1/1.7 ms, FA 15 degrees). The signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of the coronary arteries, as well as the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) between coronary arteries and perivascular tissue, were calculated for all images. Blood T (1) values were repetitively estimated over 30 min using an SSFP sequence with incrementally increasing inversion times (TR/TE 2.4/1.0 ms, FA 50 degrees).ResultsGd-BOPTA-enhanced images showed significantly (P<0.05) higher SNR and CNR compared to Gd-DTPA-enhanced images for all times after contrast injection (SNR: 1 min post injection [PI] 26.4+/-4.2 vs. 16.2+/-3.1; CNR: 1 min PI 21.4+/-3.7 vs. 13.2+/-2.6). Compared to the SSFP images, the Gd-BOPTA-enhanced images showed higher CNR values for all times after injection (1 min PI 21.4+/-3.7 vs. 13.8+/-5.5; P<0.05), whereas the Gd-DTPA-enhanced images did not (1 min PI 13.2+/-2.6 vs. 13.8+/-5.5; P>0.05). Blood T (1) estimates were not significantly different for either agent 1 min after administration (P>0.05), but they were significantly lower for Gd-BOPTA (P<0.05) from 7 to 25 min after injection.ConclusionCompared to non-contrast-enhanced SSFP images, only Gd-BOPTA-enhanced images show a significantly improved contrast between the coronary arteries and the surrounding tissue.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.