• The Laryngoscope · May 2010

    Sunnybrook facial grading system: reliability and criteria for grading.

    • J Gail Neely, Nevin G Cherian, Cody B Dickerson, and Julian M Nedzelski.
    • Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Box 8115, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. jgneely@aol.com
    • Laryngoscope. 2010 May 1; 120 (5): 1038-45.

    Objectives/HypothesisIn clinical research, which is distinctly quantitative and rigidly fixed to a written protocol, the need for precision is great, especially when multicenter trials are planned. The Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SB) is a well-established tool for assessing facial movement outcomes; however, some ambiguities do arise. The purpose of this study was to construct specific grading criteria and to test the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability before and after the use of these criteria. The hypothesis was that even in naïve observers, specific criteria improve reliability.Study DesignProspective test of hypothesis.MethodsFacial video recordings of 30 subjects with facial paralysis were randomly presented to two naïve raters in four trials; trials 1 and 2 using the SB system in the usual manner, and trials 3 and 4 using specific grading criteria for the SB system.ResultsThe SB system was reliable, even with naïve raters, having an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.890 between raters; this was improved with the use of specific grading criteria to 0.927. Additionally, variability of the SB composite scores was greatest in the midrange of scores and was predominantly seen during voluntary movement of brow rising and lip puckering.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first report of specific criteria for completing the SB system. It is also the first in-depth description of the location within the system in which the majority of variances occur.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…