-
J Magn Reson Imaging · Oct 2003
Radio-frequency-induced thermal lesions: subacute magnetic resonance appearance and histological correlation.
- Roee S Lazebnik, Michael S Breen, Maryann Fitzmaurice, Sherif G Nour, Jonathan S Lewin, and David L Wilson.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
- J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Oct 1; 18 (4): 487-95.
PurposeTo investigate the relationship between subacute magnetic resonance (MR) images of radio-frequency (RF) ablation lesions and tissue viability as determined from histological tissue samples.Materials And MethodsWe generated lesions (N = 5) in a rabbit thigh model. Four days later, we obtained in vivo T(2)- and contrast-enhanced (CE) T(1)-weighted images and ex vivo histological samples approximately perpendicular to the electrode path. Using three-dimensional registration and warping, we spatially compared manually segmented boundaries apparent on MR images to boundaries separating distinct histological zones determined from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson trichrome (MT) stains, as well as birefringence studies.ResultsLesions have a characteristic MR appearance: an outer hyperintense margin (M2) separating background tissue (M3) from an inner core (M1), in both T(2) and CE T(1) images. Histologically, there are two zones of damage: an outer zone of likely nonviable cells (H2) separating background tissue (H3) from an inner core of coagulated nonviable cells (H1). We measured distances between automatically computed correspondence points along histological and MR boundaries. For T(2) and CE T(1) images, respectively, M1 vs. H1 distances were 0.72 +/- 0.99 mm (mean +/- SD) and 0.10 +/- 0.95 mm, while outer M2 vs. H2 boundary distances were 0.26 +/- 1.16 mm and 0.05 +/- 1.08 mm. The discrepancy between histological and MR boundaries was larger than the variability in segmenting MR images, but probably within registration error. There were no significant differences between T(2) and CE T(1) boundaries.ConclusionLesion boundaries apparent in both T(2)- and CE T(1)-weighted MR scans, performed several days postablation, similarly predict the histological response. That is, the lesion core (M1) corresponds to nonviable coagulated cells (H1), while the hyperintense margin (M2) corresponds to likely nonviable cells undergoing necrotic changes (H2).Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.