• AJR Am J Roentgenol · Nov 2020

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy for TNM Stage Among Whole-Body MRI and Coregistered PET/MRI Using 1.5-T and 3-T MRI Systems and Integrated PET/CT for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

    • Yoshiharu Ohno, Yoshikawa Takeshi, Daisuke Takenaka, Hisanobu Koyama, Kota Aoyagi, and Masao Yui.
    • Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
    • AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Nov 1; 215 (5): 1191-1198.

    AbstractOBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy of TNM stage for whole-body MRI and coregistered PET/MRI using 1.5-T and 3-T MRI systems and PET/CT in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A total of 104 patients with pathologically diagnosed NSCLC underwent whole-body MRI at 1.5 T and 3T and integrated PET/CT, as well as a combination of surgical, pathologic, or follow-up examinations. Whole-body MR images obtained by the five sequences were combined with the PET part of the PET/CT using proprietary software for the PET/MRI studies. The TNM stage obtained with all methods was visually assessed. Kappa statistics were used to determine agreement between TNM stage assessment and final diagnoses, and the McNemar test was used to compare diagnostic accuracy of all methods. RESULTS. Findings of TNM stage on whole-body MRI using 3-T (κ, 0.87; p < 0.0001) and 1.5-T (κ, 0.83; p < 0.0001) systems and for coregistered PET/MRI using a 3-T system (PET/MRI3T; κ, 0.85; p < 0.0001) were rated as significant and almost perfect, and findings for coregistered PET/MRI using a 1.5-T system (PET/MRI1.5T; κ, 0.80; p < 0.0001) and PET/CT (κ, 0.73; p < 0.0001) were rated significant and substantial. Diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI using the 3-T system was 88.5% (92/104; p = 0.0002, and using the 1.5-T system it was 84.6% (88/104; p = 0.004); results for PET/MRI3T and PET/MRI1.5T were 86.5% (90/104; p = 0.001) and 81.7% (85/104; p = 0.03), respectively, which were both significantly better than accuracy of results for PET/CT at 76.0% (79/104). Moreover, diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI using a 3-T system was significantly higher than that of PET/MRI using a 1.5-T system (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION. Whole-body MRI and coregistered PET/MRI using 3-T and 1.5-T systems are as accurate or more accurate than PET/CT, whereas differences between 3-T and 1.5-T MRI systems are not considered significant.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…