-
Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. · Feb 2005
Comparative Study[Effectiveness of iodine prophylaxis in hypertensive patients on salt restricted diet].
- Wiesław Grzesiuk, Justyna Dabrowska, Maria Osikowska-Loksztejn, Agnieszka Kondracka, Karolina Kolasińska, and Ewa Bar-Andziak.
- Katedra i Klinika Chorób Wewnetrznych i Endokrynologii AM w Warszawie.
- Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. 2005 Feb 1;113(2):147-54.
BackgroundIodine prophylaxis in Poland started in 1935 however it has been interrupted during Second World War, and also in 1980. In January 1997 a new approach of preventing iodine deficiency was introduced as obligatory iodination model of household salt to be extent of 30 mg KI/kg. The aim of the study was to determine iodine intake after introduction of mandatory salt iodization in group of persons being on low salt diet because of hypertension. Investigated group and methods: The study was performed on 227 persons (94 males and 133 females), aged 18-89 years (average age 56 +/- 15,2 years). Each person answered questions concerning salt consumption and other products being additional source of iodine (fishes, pharmaceutical preparations containing iodine). Subjects were divided into two groups: according to the amount of salt consumption (119 persons restricted to household salt and 108 persons used kitchen salt) and according to the value of blood pressure (170 persons was hypertensive and 57 persons was normotensive). The urine iodine concentration (UIC) was determined in morning urine samples by the method of Sandell and Kolthoff.ResultsThe average UIC in the whole studied group was 156,1 +/- 124,9 microg/l. Woman showed lower UIC than man (132,9 microg/l vs 177,5 microg/l). In 8% of patients iodine concentration was below 50 microg/l and in 64% of patients it was 100 microg/l or more. In the case of persons consuming limited, low amount of salt, the average urine iodine concentration was 150,3 microg/l, whereas those who add some salt to a dish was 162,4 microg/l. In hypertension patients ioduria was lower than in persons with normal blood pressure (153,1 microg/l vs 164,9 microg/l).ConclusionsThe model of iodine prophylaxis has used in Poland is effective. It also concerns persons consuming limited amount of salt in the our studies group. The amount of consumed salt should be determined by measuring of Na+ concentration in 24-hour urine collection. Additional monitoring of iodine supply is necessary because of possible consumption of iodine from other sources than salt.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.