• Plast. Reconstr. Surg. · Mar 2015

    Evolution of practice patterns in plastic surgery using Current Procedural Terminology mapping: a 9-year analysis of cases submitted by primary and recertification candidates to the American Board of Plastic Surgery.

    • Michelle Lee, Harold S Haller, and Arun K Gosain.
    • Cleveland, Ohio; and Chicago, Ill. From Case Western Reserve University; Harold S Haller & Company; and the Division of Pediatric Plastic Surgery, Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
    • Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2015 Mar 1; 135 (3): 631e-637e.

    BackgroundUnderstanding plastic surgery practice patterns allows the specialty to detect subtle shifts in the market and develop proactive strategies to maintain market share.MethodsCurrent Procedural Terminology codes from American Board of Plastic Surgery recertification and primary certification candidates from 2003 to 2011 were examined. Statistical analyses identified significant changes (p < 0.05) in the percentage of surgeons performing each type of procedure and trends in average case volume per surgeon.ResultsThe overall number of procedures decreased from 2003 to 2011. There was a statistically significant (p < 0.05) decrease in the percentage of recertification and primary certification candidates performing facial cosmetic and facial malignancy procedures. Both groups also experienced statistically significant decrease in facial plastic surgery case volume. The percentage of surgeons performing breast reconstruction remained stable for the recertification group and increased significantly for primary certification surgeons. Breast reconstruction volume increased significantly for both groups. Craniofacial surgery remained stable in the percentage of surgeons performing the cases and case volume. Hand surgery experienced a significant loss of recertification surgeons performing hand surgery; however, hand surgery case volume remained stable for both groups.ConclusionFrom 2003 to 2011, plastic surgery lost market share in facial cosmetic, facial malignancy, and hand surgery and maintained market share in breast and craniofacial surgery. CPT mapping enables us to analyze these trends to better train plastic surgeons to adapt to changing pressures both from economic recovery and from competing specialties seeking to benefit from redistribution of case loads.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…