• T Holt, S Bydder, and L Bloomfield.
• Division of Radiation Oncology, Mater Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
• J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008 Dec 1; 52 (6): 605-10.

AbstractTrainee radiation oncologists must master a substantial body of skills and knowledge to become competent specialists. The resources available to support this are limited. We surveyed the 90 registrars enrolled in the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Surgeons (RANZCR) radiation oncology training programme to obtain a range of information about their learning activities (with a significant focus on part 1 teaching). Responses were received from 59 registrars (66% of those eligible). Trainees reported spending a median 2.5 h per week (range 0-10 h) in formal teaching activities. With regard to part 1 exam preparation, 83% reported having had physics teaching--the median quality was 5/7; 88% had radiobiology teaching--the median quality was 4/7; 52% had anatomy teaching--the median quality was 3/7. Registrars training within the RANZCR radiation oncologists training programme perceive their own clinical learning environment as generally good; however' 50% of respondents felt that more teaching was needed for part 1 subjects. This compared with only 19% of respondents who felt that more teaching was required for part 2 exam preparation. Innovative solutions, such as centralized web-based teaching, may help to address weaknesses in part 1 teaching. With increasing demands on radiation oncologists and trainees it will be important to monitor learning environments.

17 keywords...

hide…