• Ugeskrift for laeger · May 2002

    [Postoperative wound infection. Indicator of clinical quality?].

    • Jan Jesper Andreasen, Birgitte Korsager, Poul Alstrup, and Ole Bent Jepsen.
    • Aalborg Sygehus, thoraxkirurgisk afdeling, klinisk mikrobiologisk afdeling.
    • Ugeskr. Laeg. 2002 May 6; 164 (19): 2502-5.

    IntroductionThe aim of the study was to gain experience with continuous electronic registration of data regarding surgical postoperative wound infection after heart surgery.Material And MethodsEvery patient undergoing cardiac surgery from February 1999 to May 1999 was entered in a prospective study and followed up for 30 days. Information on the type of operation, development of postoperative wound infection, risk factors for wound infection, and a risk stratification was sent electronically to a central database.ResultsAll 180 operations were registered in the database, and risk variables were registered for all patients except one (99.4%). A spot test comprising 32% of the operations showed a diagnostic specificity of 78% with respect to correct diagnosis of wound infection. Only 4/7 (57%) of the infections were registered in the database. All deep wound infections were registered during the study period.DiscussionThe study showed that risk stratification of data in relation to postoperative wound infection after heart surgery can be registered continuously in a central database. Registration of all postoperative wound infections requires several resources and may be incomplete. However, the high quality of registration of deep wound infection and risk stratification indicates that registration of deep wound infection could be an indicator of clinical quality.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.