• Mohd Aleem, Nidhi Goswami, Mayank Kumar, and Kailash Manda.
• Division of Behavioral Neuroscience, Institute of Nuclear Medicine & Allied Sciences, Delhi 110 054, India.
• Exp. Neurol. 2020 Jul 1; 329: 113290.

AbstractModeling experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) in rodents is necessarily required to understand the pathophysiological and neurobehavioral consequences of neurotrauma. Numerous models have been developed to study experimental TBI. Fluid percussion injury (FPI) is the most extensively used model to represent clinical phenotypes. Nevertheless, the surgical 'sham' procedure (craniectomy), a prerequisite of FPI, is the impeding factor in experimental TBI. We hypothesized that if craniectomy causes substantial structural and functional changes in the brain, it might mimic the mild FPI-induced neurobehavioral dysfunctions. To understand the hypothesis, C57BL/6 mice were exposed to lateral FPI at 1.2 atm pressure and changes in the neuronal architecture, hippocampal neurogenesis, neuroinflammation, and behavioral functions were compared to the sham (craniectomy) and control mice at day 7 post-FPI. We observed that both the craniectomy and FPI significantly augmented the ipsilateral hippocampal neurogenesis as evaluated by DCX and Beta-III tubulin immunoreactivity. Similarly, a significant increase in GFAP and TMEM immunoreactivity in CA1 and CA3 regions showed that craniectomy mimics FPI-induced neuroinflammation. The additive damaging effect of craniectomy with FPI was also reported in the term of axonal and dendritic fragmentation, swelling and neuronal death using silver staining, Fluoro-jade, and MAP-2 immunoreactivity. Sham-exposed mice showed a significant functional decrease in grip strength. Our results indicate that sham craniectomy itself is enough to cause TBI like characteristics, and thus fluid percussion at mild pressure is minimally additive with craniectomy. Considering the method as a mixed (focal & diffused) injury model, the 'net neurotrauma severity' should be compared with naïve control instead of the sham as it is an outcome of cumulative damage due to fluid pressure and craniectomy. Nevertheless, to understand the long term consequences of neurotrauma, the extent of recovery in surgical sham may separately be quantified.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

24 keywords...

hide…