• S F Riches, K Hawtin, E M Charles-Edwards, and N M de Souza.
• MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK. Sophie.riches@icr.ac.uk
• NMR Biomed. 2009 Apr 1; 22 (3): 318-25.

AbstractThis study compares parameters from monoexponential and biexponential modelling of diffusion-weighted imaging of normal and malignant prostate tissue and normal rectal wall tissues. Fifty men with Stage Ic prostate cancer were studied using endorectal T(2)-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging with 11 diffusion-sensitive values (b-values = 0, 1, 2, 4, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800 s/mm(2)). Regions of interest were drawn within non-malignant central gland and peripheral zone, malignant prostate tissue and normal rectal wall tissue. Both a monoexponential and biexponential model was fitted over various b-value ranges, giving an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from the monoexponential model and a diffusion coefficient, perfusion coefficient and perfusion fraction from the biexponential model. In all tissues, over the full range of b-values, the ADC from the monoexponential model was significantly higher than the corresponding diffusion coefficient from the biexponential model. As the minimum b-value increased, the ADC decreased and was equal to the diffusion coefficient for some b-value ranges. The biexponential model best described the data when low b-values were included, suggesting that there is a fast perfusion component. Neither model could distinguish between benign prostate tissues on the basis of diffusion coefficients, but the rectal wall tissue and malignant prostate tissue had significantly lower diffusion coefficients than normal prostate tissues. Perfusion coefficients and fractions were highly variable within the population, so their clinical utility may be limited, but removal of this variable perfusion component from reported diffusion coefficients is important when attributing clinical differences to diffusion within tissues.

14 keywords...

hide…