• Sarah Everitt, Jason Callahan, Eman Obeid, Rodney J Hicks, Michael Mac Manus, and David Ball.
• Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
• J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017 Oct 1; 61 (5): 682-688.

IntroductionAcute radiation oesophagitis (ARO) is frequently experienced by patients receiving concurrent chemo-radiation therapy (cCRT) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated ARO symptoms (CTCAE v3.0), radiation dose and oesophageal FDG PET/CT uptake.MethodCandidates received cCRT (60 Gy, 2 Gy/fx) and sequential FDG PET/CT (baseline FDG0 , FDGwk2 and FDGwk4 ). Mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmean and SUVmax) and radiation dose (Omean and Omax ) were calculated within the whole oesophagus and seven sub-regions (5-60 Gy).ResultsForty-four patients underwent FDG0 and FDGwk2 , and 41 (93%) received FDGwk4 , resulting in 129 PET/CT scans for analysis. Of 29 (66%) patients with ≥ grade 2 ARO, SUVmax (mean ± SD) increased from FDG0 to FDGwk4 (3.06 ± 0.69 to 3.83 ± 1.27, P = 0.0019) and FDGwk2 to FDGwk4 (3.10 ± 0.75 to 3.83 ± 1.27, P = 0.0046). Radiation dose (mean ± SD) was higher in grade ≥2 patients; Omean (47.5 ± 20 vs 53.9 ± 10.2, P = 0.0061), Omax (13.7 ± 9.6 vs 20.1 ± 10.6, P = 0.0009) and V40 Gy (8.0 ± 8.2 vs 11.9 ± 7.3, P = 0.0185).ConclusionsFDGwk4 SUVmax and radiation dose were associated with ≥ grade 2 ARO. Compared to subjective assessments, future interim FDG PET/CT acquired for disease response assessment may also be utilized to objectively characterize ARO severity and image-guided oesophageal dose constraints.© 2017 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.

37 keywords...

hide…