• J Magn Reson Imaging · Feb 1999

    A retrospective analysis of the accuracy of T2-weighted images and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced sequences in the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions.

    • R S Pawluk, S Tummala, J J Brown, and J A Borrello.
    • Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Feb 1; 9 (2): 266-73.

    AbstractThe aim of this study was to determine the relative ability of T2-weighted and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences to detect and characterize focal hepatic lesions. We retrospectively studied 37 patients with proven focal hepatic lesions using the following sequences: a T1-weighted spin-echo sequence (T1), a T2-weighted sequence (T2), and a series of breath-hold dynamic gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences (Gd). Two observers were asked to determine retrospectively the number and type of focal hepatic lesions present using images from three combinations of sequences (T1+T2, T1+Gd, T1+T2+Gd). Proof of the number and diagnosis of focal lesions in each patient was established using a consensus read. Both readers detected more focal lesions when both the T2-weighted sequences and the gadolinium-enhanced sequences were available than on either sequence alone, although this improvement reached statistical significance (P<0.05) only for one of the readers. There was no significant difference (P<0.05) in the ability to characterize lesions between any of the sets of sequences. The combination of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced images and T2-weighted images was shown to assess focal hepatic lesions better than either of these sequences alone.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…