• Meng-Chen Yin, Jie Ye, Min Yao, Xue-Jun Cui, Ye Xia, Qi-Xing Shen, Zheng-Yi Tong, Xue-Qun Wu, Jun-Ming Ma, and Wen Mo.
• Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Longhua Hospital, Shanghai, China.
• Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Aug 1; 95 (8): 1585-93.

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and provide clinicians with an evidence base for their clinical decision making.Data SourcesPubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews.Study SelectionAll randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of ESWT for chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis were searched. Searching identified 108 potentially relevant articles; of these, 7 studies with 550 participants met inclusion criteria.Data ExtractionNumber of patients, population, body mass index, duration of symptoms, adverse effects, blinding method, and details of shockwave therapy were extracted.Data SynthesisFor intervention success rate, ESWT of low intensity was more effective than control treatment of low intensity. For pain relief, the pooled data showed a significant difference between the ESWT and control groups. For function, only low-intensity ESWT was significantly superior over the control treatment.ConclusionsThe efficacy of low-intensity ESWT is worthy of recognition. The short-term pain relief and functional outcomes of this treatment are satisfactory. However, owing to the lack of a long-term follow-up, its long-term efficacy remains unknown.Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

13 keywords...

hide…