-
Comparative Study
Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality.
- Chen-Jiang Wu, Qing Wang, Jing Zhang, Xiao-Ning Wang, Xi-Sheng Liu, Yu-Dong Zhang, and Hai-Bin Shi.
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, No. 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210000, China. njmu_wcj@163.com.
- Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Jan 1; 41 (1): 100-8.
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RS-EPI) and that of standard single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI) in the kidney in a rat model.Materials And MethodsTwelve Wistar rats undergoing MRI examinations were imaged with two diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging protocols: a standard SS-EPI and a new RS-EPI protocol, both with a 1.0 × 1.0 × 3.0 mm voxel. The two groups of diffusion-weighted images were independently scored on geometric distortion, image blurring, signal dropout, and the overall image quality by two radiologists. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured on both sequences. Inter-rater agreement (IRA) was evaluated by Fleiss kappa (κ) and inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) statistics. Comparisons of image qualities were made by Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired-sample t test.ResultsBoth RS-EPI and SS-EPI had good IRAs in scoring image qualities (κ = 0.607-0.833) and measuring renal ADCs (ICC = 0.828-0.945). Compared to SS-EPI, RS-EPI produced less geometric distortion (median score 1.5 versus 2.5, p < 0.0001), less image blurring (1.75 versus 2.0, p = 0.0003), less signal dropout (1.0 versus 3.0, p = 0.0001), and a lower score in overall image artifacts (4.25 versus 7.25; p < 0.0001). RS-EPI had higher SNR of renal DW images than SS-EPI (p < 0.001). The intra-variability of ADCs in cortex, outer medulla, and inner medulla ranged from 9.6% to 11.1% (Pearson correlation coefficient ρ = 0.675-0.729; p < 0.001) between the two protocols.ConclusionWe showed that for DWI of the kidney at 1.0 × 1.0 × 3.0 mm(3) voxel sizes, the new protocol provided better image quality than standard SS-EPI protocol.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.