• J F Polak, D Anderson, K Hagspiel, and J Mungovan.
• Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
• AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jun 1;170(6):1609-11.

ObjectiveWe studied factors that affect satisfaction of patients who have undergone placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) by interventional radiologists and patients' willingness to undergo placement of future PICCs.Subjects And MethodsThis longitudinal prospective consecutive cohort study included 85 patients referred for PICC placement. A record was made of catheter type, time taken for placement, patient age, and possible complications. Follow-up was obtained by telephone interview to determine the effect of site of placement in the arm, residence time of catheter, additional complications, and interference with activities of daily living on patient willingness to undergo future PICC placement at the same site. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors statistically predictive of patient willingness to undergo placement of future PICCs.ResultsPatients having PICCs placed above the elbow were more often satisfied (55 of 61 respondents) with catheter location than patients having placements at the elbow (three of 17 respondents). Patient willingness to undergo future PICC placement was strongly related to catheter location (p < .0001) and interference with activities of daily living (p < .0001). Catheter type, residence time, time taken for the placement, age, and complications were not associated with patient willingness to undergo future PICC placement.ConclusionPICC placement above the elbow is more acceptable to patients than placement at the elbow. PICC placement above the elbow and patients' perception of less interference by the PICC with activities of daily living are positively related to patient willingness to undergo future PICC placement.

17 keywords...

hide…