• Zhonghua yi xue za zhi · Jul 2009

    Comparative Study

    [Comparative study on clinical and pathological changes of liver fibrosis with diffusion-weighted imaging].

    • Mei-Ling Zhou, Fu-Hua Yan, Peng-Ju Xu, Cai-Zhong Chen, Ji-Zhang Shen, Ren-Chen Li, Yuan Ji, and Jian-Ying Shi.
    • Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
    • Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Jul 7; 89 (25): 1757-61.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical practical value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements based on diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) for quantification of liver fibrosis and inflammation for hepatitis viral infection.MethodsDiffusion-weighted MRI with parallel imaging was prospectively performed on 85 patients with chronic hepatitis and on 22 healthy volunteers within a single breath-hold using a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequence at b values of 100, 300, 500, 800 and 1000 s/mm2 respectively. ADC values of liver were measured with five different b values. The inflammation grades and fibrosis stages were evaluated histologically by biopsy. One-way analysis of variance and Spearman' s rank correlation test were used for statistical analysis. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to assess the performance of ADC in predicting the presence of stage > or = 2 and stage > or = 3 hepatic fibrosis, and grade > or = 1 hepatic inflammation.ResultsThere was moderate negative correlation between hepatic ADC values and fibrosis stage. And the best correlation was obtained for a b value of 800 s/mm2 (r = -0.697, P = 0. 000). At all b values there was a significant decrease in hepatic ADC in patients with stage < or = 1 versus stage > or = 2 fibrosis and stage < or = 2 versus stage > or = 3 fibrosis (P < 0.05). Hepatic ADC was a significant predictor of stage > or = 2 and > or = 3 fibrosis. The areas under the curve were 0.909 vs 0.917, sensitivity 76.6% vs 80.0% and specificity 88.3% vs 91.5% (ADC with a b value of 800 s/mm2, 1.26 x 10(-3) mm2/s or less and 1.19 x 10(-3) mm2/s or less). There was weak to moderate negative correlation between ADCs and inflammation grade. Hepatic ADC was a significant predictor of grade > 1 inflammation with an area under the curve of 0.781, sensitivity of 60.0% and specificity of 86.4% (ADC with a b value of 500 s/mm2, 1.54 x 10(-3) mm2/s or less).ConclusionThe DWI measurement of hepatic ADC can be used to quantify liver fibrosis and inflammation. It will be a new approach for early diagnosis and therapeutic follow-up of hepatic fibrosis.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…