• Stefano Carda, Andrea Biasiucci, Andrea Maesani, Silvio Ionta, Julien Moncharmont, Stephanie Clarke, Micah M Murray, and MillánJosé Del RJDRCenter for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland..
• Neuropsychology and Neurorehabilitation Service, University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: stefano.carda@chuv.ch.
• Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Aug 1; 98 (8): 1628-1635.e2.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of electrically assisted movement therapy (EAMT) in which patients use functional electrical stimulation, modulated by a custom device controlled through the patient's unaffected hand, to produce or assist task-specific upper limb movements, which enables them to engage in intensive goal-oriented training.DesignRandomized, crossover, assessor-blinded, 5-week trial with follow-up at 18 weeks.SettingRehabilitation university hospital.ParticipantsPatients with chronic, severe stroke (N=11; mean age, 47.9y) more than 6 months poststroke (mean time since event, 46.3mo).InterventionsBoth EAMT and the control intervention (dose-matched, goal-oriented standard care) consisted of 10 sessions of 90 minutes per day, 5 sessions per week, for 2 weeks. After the first 10 sessions, group allocation was crossed over, and patients received a 1-week therapy break before receiving the new treatment.Main Outcome MeasuresFugl-Meyer Motor Assessment for the Upper Extremity, Wolf Motor Function Test, spasticity, and 28-item Motor Activity Log.ResultsForty-four individuals were recruited, of whom 11 were eligible and participated. Five patients received the experimental treatment before standard care, and 6 received standard care before the experimental treatment. EAMT produced higher improvements in the Fugl-Meyer scale than standard care (P<.05). Median improvements were 6.5 Fugl-Meyer points and 1 Fugl-Meyer point after the experimental treatment and standard care, respectively. The improvement was also significant in subjective reports of quality of movement and amount of use of the affected limb during activities of daily living (P<.05).ConclusionsEAMT produces a clinically important impairment reduction in stroke patients with chronic, severe upper limb paresis.Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

29 keywords...

hide…