-
J Magn Reson Imaging · Oct 2018
Utility of volumetric contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiating between common primary hypervascular liver tumors.
- Manijeh Zarghampour, Daniel F Fouladi, Ankur Pandey, Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh, Pallavi Pandey, Farnaz Najmi Varzaneh, Pegah Khoshpouri, Nannan Shao, Li Pan, Robert Grimm, and Ihab R Kamel.
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
- J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Oct 1; 48 (4): 1080-1090.
BackgroundDifferentiating between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) is usually achievable by MRI. However, in some cases with atypical imaging findings accurate diagnosis may be difficult.PurposeTo assess the diagnostic value of volumetric contrast-enhanced (CE) and volumetric diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating between HCC, FNH, and HCA.Study TypeRetrospective.SubjectsIn all, 143 patients (206 lesions): 42 HCA (81 lesions), 51 FNH (65 lesions), and 50 HCC (60 lesions).Field Strength/Sequence1.5T MRI, T1 -T2 WI, DWI.AssessmentPatients underwent CE-MRI and DWI (b = 0, 750 mm2 /s). Volumetric assessment of lesions' contrast enhancement and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was performed with semiautomatic software after 3D image registration and segmentation by an observer and compared between three lesion groups. The diagnosis of lesions was based on histopathology, typical MRI findings, and/or follow-up.Statistical TestsIndependent t-test was used to compare parameters between two groups, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) between three groups, and receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) analysis to define under-curve area and optimal cutoff.ResultsMean values (±standard deviation) for HCC, FNH, and HCA, respectively, were: 1) arterial enhancement (%), 40.5 ± 13.2, 88.6 ± 32.6, 69.6 ± 25.1; 2) venous enhancement (%) 72.4 ± 22.1, 95.2 ± 30.9, 80.7 ± 30.6; and 3) ADC (10-6 mm2 /s) 1404.5 ± 168.1, 1413.4 ± 232.1, 1070.1 ± 232.1. ADC was the best differentiator of HCA from FNH (at 1211 × 10-6 mm2 /s; sensitivity 80.4%, specificity 71.7%) and arterial enhancement was the best differentiator of HCC from both HCA (at 48%; sensitivity 80.0%, specificity 80.5%) and FNH (at 52%; sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 85.4%). A combination of arterial enhancement and ADC (at 50% and 1227 × 10-6 mm2 /s) differentiated three types of tumors with high specificity (87.9%).Data ConclusionVolumetric CE-MRI and volumetric DWI can help to differentiate between HCC, FNH, and HCA.Level Of Evidence1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:1080-1090.© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.