-
Orthop Traumatol Sur · Dec 2020
Randomized Controlled TrialMid-term gender-specific differences in periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of a curved bone-preserving hip stem.
- Julian Stefan Meyer, Tobias Freitag, Heiko Reichel, and Ralf Bieger.
- Department of orthopaedic surgery, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081 Ulm, Germany; Department of orthopaedic surgery, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, University of Wuerzburg, Brettreichstraße 11, 97074 Wuerzburg, Germany. Electronic address: jsmeyer@mail.de.
- Orthop Traumatol Sur. 2020 Dec 1; 106 (8): 1495-1500.
BackgroundThe implant-specific periprosthetic bone remodelling in the proximal femur is considered to be an important factor influencing the long-term survival of cementless hip stems. Particularly data of gender-specific differences regarding bone-preserving stems are very rare in literature and mainly limited to short-term investigations. Therefore, we investigated at mid-term one arm of a prospective randomised study to evaluate if there is an influence of gender on implant-specific stress shielding after implantation of a curved bone preserving hip stem (Fitmore) 5 years postoperatively.HypothesisWe hypothesised there will be no gender-specific differences in periprosthetic bone remodelling.Patients And MethodsA total of 20 female and 37 male patients underwent total hip arthroplasty using the Fitmore stem. Clinical, radiological as well as osteodensitometric examinations were performed preoperatively, 7 days and 3, 12 and 60 months postoperatively. Clinical data collection included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) and the periprosthetic bone was divided into 7 regions of interest (ROI) for analysis. The results at 3, 12 and 60 months were compared with the first postoperative measurement after 7 days to obtain a percentage change.ResultsPeriprosthetic BMD showed a decrease in all 7 ROIs for both groups 5 years postoperatively referred to the baseline value, except ROI 3 (0.8%, p=0.761), representing the distal lateral part of the stem, and ROI 5 (0.3%, p=0.688), representing the distal medial part of the stem in the male cohort. Significant gender differences were found in ROI 1 (-16.0% vs. -3.5%, p=0.016) and ROI 6 (-9.9% vs. -2.1%, p=0.04) in favour of the male patients. Clinical results showed no significant gender differences 5 years postoperatively with regard to WOMAC (mean 0.4 (±0.8, 0-3.3) in women vs. 0.3 (±0.8, 0-4.2) in men, p=0.76) and HHS (mean 93.0 (±9.7, 66.0-100.0) in women vs. 93.9 (±11.5, 53.0-100.0) in men, p=0.36).ConclusionProximal stress shielding was observed independent of gender 5 years postoperatively. However, there was a significantly lower bone loss proximal lateral and medial below the calcar in male patients, indicating a more physiological load transfer. [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03147131 (Study ID D.3067-244/10). Registered 10 May 2017 - retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03147131?term=Bieger&draw=2&rank=1] LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; prospective study without control group.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.