• Chih-Wei Wang, Chun-Jung Juan, Yi-Jui Liu, Hsian-He Hsu, Hua-Shan Liu, Cheng-Yu Chen, Chun-Jen Hsueh, Chung-Ping Lo, Hung-Wen Kao, and Guo-Shu Huang.
• Department of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
• Acta Radiol. 2009 Apr 1; 50 (3): 306-11.

BackgroundAlthough the ABC/2 formula has been widely used to estimate the volume of intracerebral hematoma (ICH), the formula tends to overestimate hematoma volume. The volume-related imprecision of the ABC/2 formula has not been documented quantitatively.PurposeTo investigate the volume-dependent overestimation of the ABC/2 formula by comparing it with computer-assisted volumetric analysis (CAVA).Material And MethodsForty patients who had suffered spontaneous ICH and who had undergone non-enhanced brain computed tomography scans were enrolled in this study. The ICH volume was estimated based on the ABC/2 formula and also calculated by CAVA. Based on the ICH volume calculated by the CAVA method, the patients were divided into three groups: group 1 consisted of 17 patients with an ICH volume of less than 20 ml; group 2 comprised 13 patients with an ICH volume of 20 to 40 ml; and group 3 was composed of 10 patients with an ICH volume larger than 40 ml.ResultsThe mean estimated hematoma volume was 43.6 ml when using the ABC/2 formula, compared with 33.8 ml when using the CAVA method. The mean estimated difference was 1.3 ml, 4.4 ml, and 31.4 ml for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, corresponding to an estimation error of 9.9%, 16.7%, and 37.1% by the ABC/2 formula (P<0.05).ConclusionThe ABC/2 formula significantly overestimates the volume of ICH. A positive association between the estimation error and the volume of ICH is demonstrated.

18 keywords...

hide…