• Strahlenther Onkol · Mar 2000

    Influence of treatment technique on dose-volume histogram and normal tissue complication probability for small bowel and bladder. A prospective study using a 3-D planning system and a radiobiological model in patients receiving postoperative pelvic irradiation.

    • O Kölbl, S Richter, and M Flentje.
    • Department for Radiotherapy, University of Würzburg, Germany. koelbl@strahlentherapie.uni-wuerzburg.de
    • Strahlenther Onkol. 2000 Mar 1; 176 (3): 105-11.

    PurposeA prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the influence of pelvic irradiation techniques on the dose-volume histograms of organs at risk and to analyze its possible clinical relevance using radiobiological models.Patients And MethodsFor 20 patients receiving postoperative pelvic irradiation because of rectal cancer a 3-field technique (3-FT), a 4-field technique (4-FT) and an opposing field technique (OFT) were designed by a 3-D planning system (Helax, TMS). Dose-volume histograms (DVH) of small bowel, urinary bladder and planning target volume (PTV) were analyzed. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was determined by the radiobiological model of Lyman and Kutcher using the tolerance data of Emami.ResultsMedian dose to the PTV did not differ between the 3 techniques (3-FT/4-FT/OFT: 99.2%/98.6%/98.1% of the prescribed dose; p > 0.05). Although the median dose to the urinary bladder was lower for the 3-FT than for the 4-FT (44.7% vs 60.3%; p < 0.001), there was no difference in the calculated NTCP (0.0% vs 0.0%; p > 0.05). Using multiple field techniques both the dose to and the treated volume of the urinary bladder were significantly lower than using the OFT. As a consequence of this the late NTCP of the bladder was higher for the OFT (5.46%). Although the median dose to the small bowel was lower for the 3-FT than for the 4-FT (30.8% vs 54.5%; p < 0.005), the fractional part of small bowel within the high-dose region (90% isodose) was higher for the 3-FT (10.6% vs 8.2%; p > 0.05). Thus the calculated NTCP was higher for the 3-FT (0.79 vs 0.44) than for 4-FT. For the OFT the median dose to small bowel was 69.9% and the small bowel volume within the high-dose region was 57.8% resulting in a late NTCP of 9.36% (OFT vs 3-FT/4-FT: p < 0.05).ConclusionUsing multiple field techniques both the dose to the organs of risk and the fractional part of risk organs within the high-dose region can be reduced significantly. As a consequence of this a lower NTCP was calculated for the 3-FT and the 4-FT than for the OFT. Using the biological model a small, but significant difference between a 3-FT and a 4-FT was demonstrated in favor to the 4-FT.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.