• Acta radiologica · Jan 2016

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of image quality and application values on different field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer.

    • Haibo Dong, Yadi Li, Kang Yu, and Hui Li.
    • Department of Radiology, Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo Medical Center, Ningbo, Zhejiang, PR China donghb18@sina.com.
    • Acta Radiol. 2016 Jan 1; 57 (1): 19-24.

    BackgroundSingle-shot echo planar imaging (SS-EPI) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is the most-widely sequence in breast MRI. MRI artifacts and magnetic susceptibility are sometimes severe when this sequence is utilized at 3T.PurposeTo compare the imaging quality, ADC values between SS-EPI DWI sequence and two reduced field-of-view (rFOV) DWI sequences of breast cancer.Material And MethodsTwelve cases with breast cancer were scanned using SS-EPI DWI (FOV, 360 × 360 mm), rFOV DWI1 (FOV, 360 × 180 mm), and rFOV DWI2 (FOV, 280 × 140 mm), respectively. Image quality (scores 1 to 5) and ADC values of breast imaging were compared among three groups by different DWI sequences. SNR were compared between rFOV DWI1 and rFOV DWI2.ResultsThe imaging quality score of 12 cases was 5.00 in rFOV DWI1, 3.60 in SS-EPI DWI, and 3.75 in rFOV DWI2. The mean ADC value of 12 cases was 1.211 × 10(-3 )mm(2)/s in SS-EPI DWI, 1.107 × 10(-3 )mm(2)/s in rFOV DWI1, and 1.038 × 10(-3 )mm(2)/s in rFOV DWI2. SNR of rFOV DWI1 images was much higher than that of rFOV DWI2.ConclusionrFOV DWI1 is the optimal DWI sequence in our study. Comparing with SS EPI DWI, suitable rFOV DWI has an obvious advantage, which can present higher image resolution and less distortion. It may be helpful in the diagnosis of breast cancer.© The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2015.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.