• Can Dai, Jia Li, Qiu-Mei Li, Xiuquan Guo, Yu-Ying Fan, and Hui-Ying Qin.
• School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
• J Vasc Access. 2020 Jul 1; 21 (4): 511-519.

PurposeTo compare the effect of tunneled and nontunneled peripherally inserted central catheter placement under B-mode ultrasound.MethodsA single center, randomized, controlled, nonblinded, prospective trial was conducted in Guangzhou, China, between July 2018 and May 2019. A total of 174 participants were randomized to the experimental group (tunneled peripherally inserted central catheter) or the control group (nontunneled peripherally inserted central catheter) and were followed until extubation. Basic characteristics, peripherally inserted central catheter characteristics, the incidence of complications, and the costs of peripherally inserted central catheter placement and maintenance were collected. Data were analyzed by intention-to-treat.ResultsA total of 168 of the participants had successful peripherally inserted central catheter placements (85/87, 97.7% in the experimental group and 83/87, 95.4% in the control group, P = 0.682). Compared to the control group, the experimental group had a lower incidence of complications during the placement (18.4% vs 32.2%, P = 0.036), a lower incidence of wound oozing (27.6% vs 57.5%, P < 0.001), a lower incidence of medical adhesive-related skin injury (9.2% vs 25.3%, P = 0.005), a lower incidence of venous thrombosis (1.1% vs 9.2%, P = 0.034), a lower incidence of catheter dislodgement (1.1% vs 9.2%, P = 0.034), and lower costs of peripherally inserted central catheter maintenance at 1, 2, and 3 months (P < 0.05).ConclusionTunneled peripherally inserted central catheter may be recommended for good effectiveness.

31 keywords...

hide…