• Donna L Berry, Qian Wang, Barbara Halpenny, and Fangxin Hong.
• Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, The Phyllis F Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Boston, MA 02215, USA. donna_berry@dfci.harvard.edu
• Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Aug 1; 88 (2): 262-7.

ObjectiveTo describe relationships between use of the Personal Patient Profile-Prostate (P3P) decision support system and patient characteristics, and perceived preparation for decision making (PrepDM), satisfaction and decisional regret in the context of prostate cancer treatment choice.Methods494 men with localized prostate cancer (LPC) were randomized to receive the P3P intervention or usual care and completed pre-treatment, 1-month and 6-month outcome measures. Multivariable linear regression models were fit for each outcome.ResultsPhysician consult visits prior to enrollment, race/ethnicity, and use of clinic-provided books were significant predictors of perceived PrepDM at 1 month. Prior Internet use and PrepDM significantly predicted 6-month decision satisfaction. Decisional regret was significantly predicted by demographics, anxiety, PrepDM score, and EPIC bowel domain score at 6 months. Use of P3P did not predict any outcome.ConclusionWhile the P3P intervention did not significantly affect the outcomes, pre-enrollment information and preparation were strong predictors of the 1- and 6-month outcomes. Decision regret was significantly influenced by personal characteristics and post-treatment symptoms/side effects.Practice ImplicationsInformation received and used between biopsy and the treatment options consult visit is likely to make a difference in decision satisfaction.Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

24 keywords...

hide…